The Systematic Cover Up of Child Abuse

PCFPC.org outlines exactly how our case was handled and what our children reported was happening to them in Riverside, CA.

I was disturbed when looking at California’s human trafficking website, that reports of crimes go to Riverside County Sheriff’s Department. This is the department whose deputies and former Sergeant (allegedly) were abusing children and covered up the crime that our children reported in November of 2015.

You have to wonder how these rings are able to operate for so long, without detection or prosecution of its members. Are they assisted by those who are assigned to protect the public? Corruption exists. It is not an abstract construct or “conspiracy theory”. When laws pass that make it easier for child prostitution to exist on the streets in the Golden state, you have to ask why? What is the aim of our legislators when they pass such bills. Are the consequences considered? Are children just casualties my mere coincidence?

This video may make you wonder “Did California Legalize Child Prostitution?“.

This is also a good read https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbQSxoBkDuGXvvsiA5FBn4q5LdYVRMiEwxLTnjW0buY/edit?pli=1

 

For more information on our case, you may visit the links associated with RID 1300823 in the main menu.

We must no longer stand for and/or ignore the systematic exploitation of children around the world.

Check out this website if you are interested in details:

MASONIC CHILD ABUSE BY DESIGN

Infiltration

In the website referenced above, it is noted that the many agencies are infiltrated with high ranking members benefiting from child abuse (porn, trafficking, rituals, etc).

I wondered why the reports made to CPS by school staff, therapists, and hospital staff went ignored once contact with the alleged abuser (Bobby David Harris III) was made. All who heard the testimony of our children were initially alarmed, then fell of the earth. The CPS agents representing us from San Bernardino county did not enter a report nor show up in any way shape or form for our children and their reports.

Riverside CPS, who were not assigned to our children sent an agent who had witnessed four hours of interview to testify on the stand. She did not remember what was said. She claimed to have not been paying attention.

I do not think that she was part of the operation in any way. However, for her to make such an outrageous claim, when her only job was to listen and act on their behalf points to some sort of interference.

No report ever made it past the Riverside County Sheriff’s department. And CPS agents remained silent and absent to do their job.

Threats

Our children were told by their father that if they told, he would kill me. This was especially driven into our son when visitation resumed in March of 2016, after nearly four months of no contact with his father.

He became afraid to leave the house and would wet or defecate his clothing. If in public, our son would cling to me, afraid that I would be attacked or killed. I took him to the hospital and he had an X-Ray to see why he could not control his bowel movements before he told me of the threats during supervised visits with his father.

The visits were supervised by the father’s mother, who my son claimed would leave him alone with his father while she and his sister went to the bathroom. That is when his father would make the threats. He said he believed the threats because his father had hurt people before.

He told me that people who participated in the group activities referred to his father as “master”.

I reported these threats to the police, CPS, and to the judge.

I asked for supervised visits and referenced subpoenaed bank statements that showed large (in the 10s of thousands) cash deposits in their father’s bank account. He was granted supervised visits with his mother because he claimed to be “unemployed and broke”. More lies on the pile.

No action was taken. I suppose acknowledging the large cash deposits would come with questions. Who knows?

Drugging

Our children claim to have been regularly given pills or things to drink that made them feel strange. This also made it hard to recall details or made some events they remembered surreal. They both recalled being filmed and claimed that their father kept the videos of them in a safe.

In the site reference above, it claims that children are drugged to confuse their awareness and the validity of their experiences, when/if recounted.

Pedophile Guardians

When children do speak out to people who have no part in the abuse, these people are threatened either by the abusers or their friends in high places. No professional involved would risk their career to accurately account for what they heard our children report.

They remained silent and unprofessional.  Compliant in letting the abusers go free.

Brotherhood Protection

In the web reference, it claims that “It is well documented that even when … abusers are challenged about the alleged abuse they become arrogant …[and]… continue the abuse for many years after. This is due to the fact they know they can continue do what they have always done with impunity as they are fully protected by their ‘Brotherhood’, secret-society ‘friends in high places’.”

I understand intimidation, and protecting one’s family and career from harm by remaining silent. But children will be exploited into perpetuity if no one will speak up.

Rituals

Our children claim to have witnessed many ritualistic behaviors. I’ll leave it there. There is plenty on this elsewhere, and may be a lot to swallow if you are not familiar with ritualistic abuse. I know that took a long while for me to get my head around what they described.

The ‘No Evidence’ Lie

When the police were contacted by the social worker on staff at Kaiser Hospital,  a deputy who our children claim was party to the abuse arrived with a rookie cop. The rookie was put in charge of the investigation until Detective Boyd was assigned.

These handpicked cops ignored the allegations and were biased from the very beginning. Searching their father’s home in two parts, with two weeks in between. In the interim, their father loaded the contents of the un-searched area in to a U Haul truck and hired a professional cleaning company.  Then relied on the fact that “There was No-Evidence”.

This crime was purposely and strategically mishandled from the start. Hard evidence was not found. But our children’s accounts and the response to the abuse, and these outrageous actions by the authorities points to obstruction of justice.

‘Missing’ Files Syndrome

“The Masonic Child Protection Police will conveniently ‘loose’ files of documents and witnesses statements of evidence as well as any film taken of the abuse.”

Besides the fact that our children claimed to have been regularly filmed in sexual and strange situations. None of the video evidence would be found. Even if recovered at the scene, it could have been lost.

Our children’s interview was recorded at the police station in Corona, CA. It was a two hour interview where they said they pointed out where they were touched and described what had happened to them. The DA claimed to have not viewed the tape before not pursuing criminal charges. Where is that tape?

I’ve spoken with family members of a former Sergeant of Riverside County Sheriff’s department. A family friend of their father, and direct supervisor of the deputy the children claimed was involved in the ring. They told me that child pornography was submitted along with his computer to Corona Police. They sat on it for a year and took no action.

His family told me that this is a group of sick men who do sick things and that his group had no boundaries and covered for each other. It was recommended that I take our children and “get out of dodge”.

However, I was confident at that point that our justice system was just that. And that our children would be legally free of the abusers they claimed harmed them.

I was wrong.

Falsified Charges

When Riverside failed to take criminal action on their father, or the men and women they reported filmed and abused them, they also ignored all evidence of trauma from Austin Texas, where the children were being treated.

The judge granted full custody to their father. I was not even allowed to have contact with them. After nearly two years of protecting them and fiercely advocating for justice and their mental health.

When I did not just release my children to the wolves, I was criminalized.  It is not criminal to protect your children from impending and serious danger.

Good Cops Side-tracked

“Decent Non-corrupt Police Child Protection officers can also become involved in the case. As soon as they get suspicious and complain, they are told to shut up and are either removed from the case or they leave the force. The most decent cops become whistle-blowers themselves.”

Whistle-blower Harassment

When I reported the police officers in their involvement in the abuse, and their misconduct in the investigation, I was subject to ongoing and insidious harassment and  surveillance.

I submitted pictures and video reference to the courts of men who followed us home from school, and men who robbed us and tore down our video cameras the day I installed them outside. Their faces were shown. This submission was somehow removed from record, and I could not access my gmail accounts after submitted the video links and images.

Back up everything.

 

Psychiatric Incarcerations for Whistle- blowers

While my ex husband constantly claims I am “crazy”. I have no record or history of mental instability. I have never been treated by a psychiatrist, nor medicated. Although, he has recently. I think the multiple criminal convictions, allegations, and the leaking of the truth about him brought him much mental anxiety.

But they have succeeded in scheduling for my incarceration. Child protection has been misinterpreted as child stealing. This is some circus. But I will not play live threatening games with my children. To do so would indicate mental instability.

 

Pseudo- Incompetence

“The public court enquiry will always ‘find’ Gross incompetence’s and Negligence of the Police and Child Protection Services during their initial and subsequent enquiry’s into the abuse. “

Agencies failed to adequately do their job to represent and protect children at every turn in our case.

“Gross Incompetence and Negligence” is actually “Non-compliance” and “Pseudo-incompetence”.

The ‘loss’ of witnesses statements and crucial documents and film, is in fact the destruction of documents. In our case, no neighbors or those who were named as abusers were questioned.

I spoke to an old friend and neighbor. It was reported to me that other neighbors had seen him loaded video equipment and props in to the U Haul truck. He parked it around the corner for nearly a week. This was not a quick dumping of debris as he and the police report. Even so, debris is not an excuse to perform a partial search and allow the suspect to clean up evidence.

His bank records support what the neighbors report. The U Haul truck was rented for one week.

The Police are never ‘truly’ reprimanded. I received letters after a couple of months from the Riverside County Sheriff’s department stated that my allegations were all unfounded.

The Sergeant mentioned previously, however, did take early retirement.

Where is the accountability?

Whistle-blowers Severely Punished or Killed

Because I would not subject our children to further abuse, I face imprisonment and loss of my basic freedom. I am not a criminal or threat to anyone. I am a mother who has tirelessly advocated for her children over the last two years in this impossible situation.

 

NO Justice – Ever

Instead of justice for telling the truth of their abuse, our children have been victimized further. Their very right to a peaceful and safe environment has been stripped away from them by the courts, for no clear reason.

Evidence of abuse and mishandling of our case is much stronger than “not obeying a court order”. But there is much more to our case than what meets the eye. And I now see that I was in losing battle from the beginning, by entering their courts.

We are now free of the abusers and their acts, but our lives have been drastically changed and endangered in other ways.

Remember – There are NO Isolated cases and There are NO Coincidences!

IN THE NEWS

Recently in the News:

California Cop Arrested for Child Porn Placed on Paid Suspension

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2014/10/17/california-highway-patrol-officer-arrested-on-child-pornography-charges/

School board president arrested for child porn in California

EVIDENCE PRESENTED in brilliant write-up  which explains the detail of six cases that point to this being more than mere separate incidents or isolated events.  Each case is heavily researched with links. It is important to conduct a personal investigation, and not default to take our word for it, or anyone else’s; each must seek their own conclusions.

Riverside County Sheriff’s Deputies

Deputy Jackson, along with Rookie Deputy Cox performed the initial search of Bobby Harris home in Eastvale, CA, November 2015. Olivia Baker, from Riverside CPS, testified on the stand December 22nd, 2015, that she waited outside of the home for hours while Crystal Turner was inside, for the deputies and Mr. Harris to arrive.

They then conducted a search of the home, not including the garage. Although both Mr. Harris and the Riverside County deputies claim that a construction project was occurring, and used that as an excuse to exclude the search of the garage, the project had been completed and cleaned up weeks prior by the home owner’s insurance company.

On the stand, Olivia Baker did not use the excuse given by authorities. She expressed that Mr. Harris claimed he did not have the key to access his own garage. So it was left un-searched.

Which ever the reason, I believe that evidence to what my children claim was occurring at their father’s home was in that garage. Given the severity of the allegations, no locked door or construction project should have hindered the complete search of their father’s home to uncover any evidence.

After the search, deputy Jackson and Cox went to the hospital to visit with my children. They had disclosed abuse to the social worker and doctor on staff. We arrived at the hospital at 4pm, the social worker went off duty at 9 pm, and the officers arrived just before 10 pm.

Deputy Jackson did all of the talking, told me that my son did not speak, that my daughter’s statements were inconclusive, and that she would not arrest an innocent man on false allegations.

She handed me a generic card, and wrote deputy Cox’s email address on the back. She told me to send any information there, and that a detective would be in contact shortly. I initially thought that she was Deputy Cox because of this. She did not want me to have her name or contact information. And why our case was assigned to a rookie officer is beyond me.

Deputy Cox took the stand on behalf of Mr. Harris on December 22nd, 2015. He testified to hearing our little girl speak of being molested by multiple men. He claimed to have not believed her because of her calm demeanor. In his professional opinion, she was coached.

Did I mention that this deputy was in training?

He was dismissed for lack of experience in the field.

The day after the half-search was performed, Mr. Harris rented a U Haul truck, filled it with the contents of his garage, and parked it around the block for a week. He claims it was full of debris and that he dumped the contents in a dumpster of a nearby apartment complex, Homecoming.

I wonder if video footage will support that “crime/story”. Probably not. A neighbor shared that she saw him loading video equipment and props into the van. And when she approached him on it and wanted to know where he got all of that cool equipment, he handed her the card of our old neighbor, and ex police officer. Mr. Harris told her to mention his name, and she would get a discount. His subpoenead bank statements also show that the truck was rented for a week.

This does not coincide with his rent and dump crime/story.

Also, when I lived at the residence, there were three entry ways in to the garage, and we could not lock ourselves out from the inside. We were also in the habit of legally dumping our trash in rented Waste Management dumpsters.

Our children claim that Deputy Jackson is part of the group involved in criminal activity with their father. According to them, she regularly visited their home in and out of uniform.

She is a direct report to Sergeant Sanford. Allegations regarding child pornography have been brought against him as well.

Here is a true and correct copy of the report submitted by Deputy Jackson.

Here is a true and correct copy of the report submitted by Deputy Cox.

The running theme with all people have contact with or even hear of this case (like the children’s attorney) is to presume coaching. Why?

How the POLICE investigate child abuse allegations

If concerns about child abuse are reported to the police, they have a duty to investigate. This page tells you more about these investigations and how the decision to prosecute is taken.

Law Enforcement Response to Child Abuse

How the police investigate allegations of child abuse

If someone reports concerns about child abuse to the police, the case will be dealt with by a specialist child abuse investigation team.The team may do one or more of the following things to investigate the allegations:

  • share information with the local authority, schools, and health services to establish what is already known
  • visit and speak to the child, either with or without parental permission
  • visit the home where the child lives or where the offence took place
  • search for and seize evidence of the offence
  • arrange a medical examination of a child (see below)
  • place a child into police protection for up to 72 hours if they believe the child is at risk of immediate significant harm
  • gather statements from potential witnesses (see below).

Medical examinations

The police may want the child who has been abused to be medically examined. The first priority in a medical examination is the safety and welfare of a child.  If a child needs immediate medical treatment, this will always come before any other consideration. Where the child is very young, the parents have to give permission for a medical examination. On rare occasions, a social worker may seek a court order for a medical examination to take place if a parent won’t allow it. If the child is older, the doctor will have to be satisfied that the child is clearly able to give their consent to be medically examined. Police and social workers may attend the medical examination along with the child’s parents and it will be carried out by a specialist pediatrician who will make a record of any injuries and arrange photographs if necessary. If you visit a GP with concerns about child abuse, a further specialist medical examination may need to take place.

Statements

The police may ask anyone who could be a witness to the abuse to provide a statement. This may be written or, particularly with children, by interviewing in a special room with video or DVD recording equipment. When a child is interviewed, a social worker will often be present or may even conduct the interview if they have specialist training. If you are suspected of child abuse, the police must either arrest you or invite you to speak to them at a police station. They must advise you of your legal rights and offer you the opportunity of seeking advice from a solicitor.

Police complaints

If you’re unhappy about the way the police investigate allegations, you may be able to make a complaint.

The decision whether or not to prosecute

Once the police have conducted their investigation and gathered all relevant information, they have to decide if there is enough evidence to consider a prosecution. If there is enough evidence, the police papers are passed to the Child Protective Service (CPS) who make the decision whether a suspect should be charged with an offence or not. CPS may ask the police to make further enquiries or obtain additional evidence. There are guidelines in place which CPS must follow when dealing with a child abuse case. When they make the decision about whether to prosecute someone, specialist prosecutors in CPS must look at all the relevant evidence and decide:

  • if there’s a realistic prospect of conviction, and
  • if a prosecution is in the public interest.

The guidelines say that victims and witnesses should be made aware from the start of the investigation exactly what is expected of them, particularly in terms of going to court and giving evidence, and they should be offered support to help them in this process.  When considering how believable a child or young person is, the police and CPS should focus on the allegation, rather than focusing just on any perceived weaknesses in the victim. In particular, police and prosecutors should avoid making assumptions about victims. A reluctance to cooperate with those in authority, failure to report allegations of abuse swiftly, and providing inconsistent accounts are not uncommon in victims of child sexual abuse, especially during initial interviews’.

The child or young person can be told that other people have made allegations about the suspect. But this should usually only be done after they have given their own account and the details of other allegations shouldn’t be shared.